Dominican journalist Sergio Carlo rebuts Celso Marranzini’s claims on solar energy

Santo Domingo.- In a detailed post on X, prominent journalist and communicator Sergio Carlo publicly countered recent statements by Celso Marranzini, who expressed skepticism about the impact of distributed generation and the integration of solar panels into the national grid. Carlo described Marranzini’s remarks as “misinformed” and warned that they reveal a concerning disconnect from technological advancements.

Carlo argued, via his X account, that Marranzini’s statements are not only incorrect but also misleading, emphasizing the technological benefits and successful international implementations of distributed solar energy systems.

The journalist highlighted the importance of these systems in reducing greenhouse gas emissions, improving energy efficiency, and decreasing dependency on fossil fuels. He pointed out that Marranzini’s stance seems to favor a centralized energy model that benefits a select few, rather than supporting a more sustainable and equitable energy future for the Dominican Republic.

In his post, Carlo addressed the inaccuracies in Marranzini’s statements, stating that distributed generation systems are designed to work in conjunction with the national grid and have been successfully implemented in countries like Germany, Spain, and Chile. He called for the Dominican Republic to embrace innovative energy solutions and modernize its electrical infrastructure to fully benefit from renewable energy sources.

Reactions from users on X

The reactions to Sergio Carlo’s post on X were swift and varied, reflecting a broad spectrum of support for his stance on solar energy and distributed generation. Users from different backgrounds and perspectives chimed in, underscoring the importance of modern, sustainable energy solutions and criticizing the resistance rooted in economic interests and outdated approaches.

Movimiento Duartianos Unidos (@DuartianoUnido) praised Carlo’s analysis for uncovering the economic motivations behind the resistance to solar energy, likening it to historical instances where economic interests hindered technological progress. They suggested internationalizing the debate, challenging the official narrative with technical data, and forming alliances to strengthen the movement toward democratizing energy.

Samuel Abreu (@ingsamabreu) underscored the role of smart inverters in stabilizing solar energy systems, counteracting Marranzini’s claims about service interruptions caused by solar power.

Domingo Ant Grullon Rivas (@dogrullon) pointed out the vested interests of Marranzini and his associates in the energy sector, suggesting that their opposition to solar energy is self-serving.

Luisito Adon (@adon_luis) criticized the management of the energy sector under Marranzini, linking the current issues with power generation and interruptions to his leadership, and implying that privatization is being presented as the sole solution.

Ei Pipo (@ei_pipo) questioned the inconsistency between the claims of solar energy’s unreliability and the simultaneous promotion of solar parks by energy producers.

RMG80 (@RamyGDL) commented on Marranzini’s outdated methods, suggesting that his approach is not in line with modern energy solutions.

rosinisd (@rosinisd) advocated for a strategic plan for the Dominican Republic to achieve significant reliance on renewable energy sources like solar, wind, and marine energy.

Francisco (@Francis71305643) highlighted the financial benefits to the country from reduced fossil fuel consumption due to solar energy.

Overall, the reactions indicate strong support for Carlo’s position, emphasizing the need for modern, sustainable energy solutions and criticizing the resistance rooted in economic interests and outdated approaches.